Category: book Nook
I just started reading the first book in the fifty shades trilogy. Haven't really made up my mind yet if it's hot or not. If you've read it, tell me your opinion. If you haven't, would you consider it? Tell me what you all think.
I hear the entire trilogy is in the process of being recorded and put on the BARD NLS site for download. When it is available, I will check it out just because I've heard so much about the first book and the entire trilogy. People seem to either hate it or love it. I haven't heard any middle of the road comments.
I read the first book just to see what the craze was all about. And you're right, Becky, no middle of the road on this one, people do either love it or hate it. I fall into the hate it category. It's not even that I'm opposed to the content. Granted, that isn't usually my kind of genre, but I have no problem with explicit sex scenes. The thing with this is, it's terribly written. The author uses the same words to describe everything. For example, when it comes to dialogue, the characters always, "murmur." The author also seems to have run out of ways to describe an orgasm, because she repeats herself many times. It might be somewhat passable if it had a plot, but it really doesn't. It's written entirely for the sex. I simply cannot read the other two books in the trilogy. Ugh.
I've never read it, but I'll definitely pass on doing so. I'm not one who typically goes with society's take on things, but based on the samples I've found online, it's poorly written.
Irrespective of the unimportant subject at hand, and of all the other useless information posted on this board, yo Becky, I see you got da lowdown on a book being put through the recording process for bard.
How did you get this insider information? Is there a forum or some blog or even just an insignificant source for bard members I ain’t done heard of?
It would be rather neato to know what's coming up before new books are uploaded up on that bard website thang.
Raskolnikov, I'm on an email list called reading our way, and one of the other people on that list works for NLS. When several people mentioned they would like to read Shades, she told us that it is in the process of being recorded. However, this is the only time I have ever known anything ahead of time about upcoming books, so don't join the list just for that. I find this particular list generally a waste of time.
I'd also like to add to what Sister Dawn said. I've heard even from people who love the books that the writing is terrible. I guess the author started out writing for fan fiction which explains a lot because when you write for the internet, most people don't care much about correct grammar, creativity, or anything else related to what most people think of as good writing ability.
The story behind fifty shades is this. The writer was a twilight fan. yes, twilight, that bastion of awful writing which has corrupted the popular imagination. She, the writer, decided that there was not enough sex in twilight. Because having a series full of beastiality, nechrophelia, and pediphelia wasn't enough for her. So she wrote her own version, taking out the vampire stuff and putting in sex. Not that its much of a change, they're equally as poorly written.
Some of her friends read this book, which I think was called master of the universe, but don't quote me. These friends, because this author has fucking morns as friends, told her she should publish. However, the book still had the names bella and edward as the characters. She went through with a redpen, missing a few in the first publication, and changed the names. Then it was published as fifty shades of grey.
It was once put through a program which compares works for plageristic purposes. It is eleven percent off twilight. that means eighty-nine percent of it is twilight. They just added some badly written sex into it. I'd say they also took out the plot, because the book doesn't have one, but twilight didn't have one either.
Cody is exactly right. I could tell even from the first book that it was based on Twilight. The author doesn't even try to conceal that fact. I read a couple of the Twilight books for the same reason I read the first Fifty Shades: I was curious what all the fuss was about, and wanted to judge for myself rather than just the impressions of others. I got through more of Twilight than I did Fifty Shades, mostly due to the train-wreck syndrome. Meyer's writing isn't great, but I have to say she was a better writer than E. L. James, and that does not say much.
As an aside, I really feel bad for the narrator who had to read the Fifty Shades books for NLS. I hope they got paid well, (though I'm not sure NLS does pay very well), because reading all those, and trying to make the sex scenes even halfway believable, is a chore I would avoid like the plague.
All I can add is Thank God someone else hates Twilight. I'm so sick of hearing people sing the praises of those books.
This series is dangerously juvenile.
Not only is it a thinly veiled fanfic of Twilight (that is how it started out to begin with), but it irresponsibly and inaccurately depicts BDSM culture. The author takes an immature, glossed-over stance on a fetish that, while I'm glad the world is talking about it, can be dangerous when it's handled how it is in the books.
Much like Twilight, 50 Shades comes off as heterosexist, misogynistic, immature and downright abusive in terms of its views on intimate relationships.
Miss M, what is heterosexist? That's a term I've never heard before.
This is a kind of book for me that I get bored of reading easily. I'm not planning on reading book two. Book one isn't really catching my intrest, in fact, I deleted the book off my VRS without finishing it. You're right about it having a poor writing style. I also find Anna and Christian to be boring characters, especially Christian.
I'm reading it through audible, and it's 19 hours long. Right now, I have no idea how on earth it could be that long. I can't imagine what the author could have put in here. I am also in the I hate twilight club. I guess that's why anna and Christian are boring, Edward and Bella were as well.
Heterosexist means it follows the traditional norms of what heterosexuality has been defined by: A dominant, masculine, manly male and a submissive, feminine, womanly (girlish?) female.
There is a wonderful spork of fifty shades, and twilight for that matter, on das-sporking.livejournal.com. They have sporks of other books too, but I particularly like there fifty shades and twilight sporkings. They are very well done and very funny. I highly suggest reading them instead of the books.
I actually fall sort of in the middle on this one. Honestly, I found the book pretty boring, but the plot does get better later in the series. I found the dominant sex culture interesting, but it could have been written a lot better. I think it's pretty pointless to base your book on another book. It's not as bad as some books out there, but after getting through the first two books, I was just too bored to read the third. The characters are a bit predictable, but at least it's getting people reading. It's also opening up a culture that is hidden behind closed doors far too often, which I commend it for. But, if you want some good literary sex seens with a plot too, read the new species series. Now those are some good books.
But that's the problem, its not doing that. It isn't opening up a culture which is usually hidden behind closed doors. What happens in the book isn't actually BDSM. I've talked to BDSM fans who read the book and it disgusted them. It totally misrepresents them.
Agreed with Cody. The people into BDSM that I've talked to are actually rather ticked off at how the author represents them. I'd say most of us can identify with that one, since blind people are nearly always misrepresented in literature too. I just learned that my older sister falls into the "love it" category. Ugh. Why am I not surprised? The really crazy thing is that my stepmom is reading them too, and even though she doesn't care for them, she says she never gives up in the middle of a series, so she's forcing herself to read all three books. What a waste of time. If you don't like something, quit reading it.
sounds like I'm not missing anything by not reading this nonsense lol... I'm usually the type to want to finish a series once I start reading it also, but if it's something I just can't stand I'll not read it and waste my time. I'll find something I actually like instead.
You're not missing out on anything TechnologyUser. It's really not a very good series.
It's porn. Porn with poor writing and little more than shock value keeping it afloat. At least that's what I'd like to think. In truth I've only read what a few people have dictated to get my reaction. Hardly grounds for judgment perhaps, but it's still porn. But no matter how well-written it is, there's still no nice or sexy way to say butt plug.
I don't know about that, I've read some very well written porn before, and they find a sexy way to say just about anything. E. L. James just isn't talented or trained as a writer.
I've never read it, but if what you all say is true, then how the heck did it get published.
i've tried to read twilight, not fond of the books, like the movies. then again same goes for hp. books verses movies i'll take the movies. lol.
It got published because as insulting as this is going to sound, the general reading public is stupid, and publishers know that. You put out a book and say, "Its full of sex", and people will buy it. Even if its horribly written, and lacking in all plot.
hi i have my thoughts about this book. it is crap. i read it. and i felt it was not even good. that's all.
It sertenly got the little american christian vergins something to read, but the bad thing is it makes sex look like something evil and ugly, witch, it is not, if done propperly. Same as all porn really, porn just makes sex look so, I can't explain it. Ugly, I guess. It's as if they really don't care what they publish thees days.
Where did all the pritty little romances go, where there was the perfect balance between sex, and love?
Guess this is what we're destened, as book reading folk, to read for the rest of our days.
On another note, did you know they're makeing plans for it to be made in to a movy? The main guy is ment to be played by alexanda what's his name, the guy who played eric in true blood.
The entire trilogy was put up on BARD today, Sept. 4, so if anyone wants to try it to see what it's all about, it is now available for free. I intend to read, or at least start, the first book to see what I think, but I really don't expect to like it. I know some people who love it, but frankly these people are ready to read anything with sex in it whether the writing is good or bad.
American Christian virgins? Lmao! My question is, what are you reading to come up with that concept?
Frankly I'd rather be force-fed a plate of porcupines rather than sit through any reading of such ... tasteful material.
"American Christian virgins"??? Will it be any different if it is a British virgins? further more, the author itself is not American or such.
I must admit i read the first book,just to check it out and curious about the fust. I'm rather disappointed with it. Twilight is bad enough, this is, well, worst in its own way.
I've no problem with irotic fiction, but this is rather a porn fiction, without the graphics and images to support.
And i do think, in some way, it miss educate the teens, specially with Anna and that mr. grey's business.
I loved Twilight. That being said I still haven't read book 1 of the 50 Shades Of Gray. I might but don't really know yet.
Hi! Raskolnikov wanted to know about upcoming books to be made available. If you have a title of the book you're interested in and go to he NLS site at
http://www.loc.gov/nls
You can click on the quick search link and put the title in the title field and click on the search button. if it's in the process of being narrated it'll let you know. Hope this helps.
I can honestly say that I have never read a book that has been part of a culture craze, such as Twilight, HP, or 50 Shades. I know people who ahve loved it and hated it... and it honestly seems like something I wouldn't want to read based on the writing style and caricature protagonists.
I can honestly see why Harry Potter is what it is, because it encumpasses so many aspects that many readers enjoy, and it appeals to a wide audience. Twilight (which I have admitedly read all four books) ... well to be completely honest I don't know why exactly that's popular. It had some interesting ideas, but both protagonists, while I can sort of see why some girls might find aspects of Edward and Jacob appealing - make me want to drown stuffed kittens. Fifty shades though......Well, I'm at a loss here honestly.
Ok, so I just read today that they've asked Justin Bieber to star in the 50 shades movie. Hmmmm, still trying to figure out as who.
Please tell me you are joking!
I fail to see why he has even gone as far as he has. some call it talent; I call it bologna.
I agree. I can't stand to hear him sing. And besides, I thought he went around talking about remaining a virgin and being a Christian. If that is true, why would he even consider being in a movie that will likely have trouble getting an R rating. I can't even imagine this movie not being rated X.
I completely agree. Justin Bieber has no talent what so ever. The bad thing is, if he does get in this movie, then it will be a big hit. I'm also not sure if he is actually gonna be in it, but he did tell Jonathan Ross that he was asked to be in it. I hope he doesn't, and I'm not looking forward to that movie coming out. It'll be worse than Twilight.
I just thought I'd share this with you guys. I saw this, and I couldn't stop laughing. It's Ellen reading a part of 50 shades. It's hilarious.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on3JCwnwHbU
The one of gilbert godfreed reading it is better. I'll find a link if I can. Imagine the parrrot from aladin reading the book.
I think I saw a part of that on youtube.
Thanks glimmer. ANy morbid curiosity I ever had about this book just faded into a lasting desire to eat drywall rather than read fifty shades of gray. That and Honey BooBoo have completely decimated my faith in human entertainment.
O my god Honey BooBoo. I completely agree with you. lol
What the hell is Honey Boo Boo? I was just watching the preview for the new South Park episode that comes on tomorrow, and they said something about it, or her or him, I'm not sure which, lol. Then I come on here and see it mentioned again.
I'm not 100% sure. It's a show about this little redneck girl. From what I've heard, it is not at all a very enjoyable show. I think maybe the little girl was once on toddlers and tiaras? Maybe someone else can give you a better description of it.
I read the entire 50 shades trilogy. E. L. James is a talentless writer. The book is horribly constructed, she doesn't have an extended vocabulary, and her characters have no depth. I hate that the book was written to mimic Twilight, but I'll admit that James was a genius for doing it. Why wouldn't you if you saw all the hype and money the Meyer received for her toilet treasure. It really is not hard to captivate, impress, or entertain an audience these days.
I have a great appreciation for erotic literature, but like another poster said, this bitch couldn't think of very many ways to describe an orgasm, and ruined any kind of sexiness by applying the personalities of Bella and Edward to her main characters, but also by trying too hard to give this a story line. Booooooooooo! And the story line was shit! And most of all, the trilogy has a happy ending, they wind up having a kid together and living happily ever after in their beautiful home. Gag me!
I would not dare say that Meyer is a better writer than James. These women and their publishers take a huge, diarrhetic shit on the delectable, beautiful, thought-provoking art that writing is.
You know, there's a point I had not thought of. I've always considered E. L. James an idiot because she can't write worth a damn. However, Sapphire is right: she was actually smart to pattern a story after a sensation like Twilight. It helped her case that the Twilight books had bad characters and were not well-written, so it's not like she had to make much effort either. So, like Meyer, she made a shitload of money without doing much work or having much talent.
After reading all these comments in addition to reviews on a book email list I am on, I've decided to delete this trilogy from my hard drive. I hadn't quite gotten to the point of transferring it from my computer to a thumb drive yet, and now I'm absolutely sure I do not want to read it. Thanks all for helping me make up my mind. I have so many authors that I love and so many books that I really do want to read, why should I waste time on shit like this trilogy just because it is on the best seller list? I've never given in to reading stuff before just because it seemed everyone else in the world was reading it, but for some reason, I almost gave in this time, but now I've come to my senses.
Honey Boo Boo became somewhat of a brief sensation a while ago. She's this little girl who is known for having a ton of energy due to her "go Juice" which is essentially caffine combined with energy drinks (and I'm not sure what else.) Keep in mind the child's only in the middle single digits of life; way too young to be ingesting such a substance. I believe she was on toddlers and tiaras - which is disturbing enough. Now she's got her own show. I can accept there are people who would find that morbidly fascinating. Car accidents, tornadoes and plane crashes are morbidly fascinating to some people too. What I can't abide is someone actually sat down one day and thought "hey, Remember that little girl on drugs? She would make an absolutely phinominal reality show!"
As for Fifty Shades, I guess the author was smart for doing what she did. But that doesn't change the fact that this is little more than an abusive aborted wet-dream set down to writing which is pretty much a slap in the face to anyone looking to make a career in the industry.
As for Twilight, As much as I hated Edward and Bella (and I have read the entire twilight series) I feel that Stephanie Myre redeamed herself quite a bit with the writing of The Host, a book few people seem to talk about for some reason.
Oh my, that sounds terrible. Do you know what my first thought was when I heard the name Honey Boo Boo? I thought, she must be Snooky's little sister. Haha. I guess the truth is actually worse.
heheh, I like that.
Fifty Shades of Shit!!
I read a little bit of this book before my boyfriend (who also read a little bit) and I realized that this talentless gold-digging, blood sucking monkey called E. L. James made a assload of money from a poor excuse of a trilogy. JesusGod on holy fuckToast!!! How dare she call herself a writer? How dare she publish this pittiful piece of so-called pop fiction. It's insulting to erotic fiction and insulting to S and M, and extra insulting to a writer like myself.
i, am, angry!! This sort of thing really has me about as pissed off as a slut trapped in a convent. You all know why? Because someone like myself, a writer who has actually given a shit about the craft, who has worked tirelessly in the last ten years to perfect it, to make it better, has a rough time catching the attention of a prominent literary agent. Will someone publish my book on the first try? fuck no. Not without a killer synopsis and a fucking superior book proposal. And I have to write and rewrite and rewrite again just to keep my craft in practice. And I labor and labor and labor over my writing like it's my first-born child. Yet this ignoramus, this silly socialite who is some sort of a famous tv presentor or something, this trollip--she coppies a bullshit series and comes up with an entirely new bullshit series and guess what?
she gets, it, published!! Wow. What the fuck? Not only that, she gets her bullshit series publicized all over the news. CNN takes a whole five minutes to fucking talk about how pittifully popular these books are!! Shit...When I heard at least three different news sources rave about this trilogy and talk about how it got banned from several schools and libraries, I thought hey, I'm checking this shit out for sure. This aught to be good.
Well imagine the bad taiste this left in my mouth... A plotless joke with two-dementional characters, with the sex sceen written like they'd come out of a hundred-year-old grannie's diary. Hey, e. L. James, it's not length. He didn't put his "length" inside her. It's called a penis, you retarded prude!! A penis. A dick a cock. A rod even. God... what else can you call it--but a length? What if it's short and stout. How then, is it a length.
Damn.
I love erotic fiction. I read it on a regular basis from different sources. and guess what--people who don't get paid a single penny, who are nobodies in this fucked up society of ours write stunning porn compared this this crockery. Stunning. I've read romances, novelas, even streight sex stories with better plot than this jumble of catshit. And why aren't these writers on cnn?
Guess what?
I've never tried my hand at writing erotic fiction. At least not formally. But I've read plenty of it, as I said. So here's what I'm proposing.
I will write my own erotic series, with a kick ass plot all my own, with dynamic, humorous, sexy and loveable characters. Who's going to pay me a buck to read it?
lol
A buck. That's all. I'll sell each book in it's entirety for a buck. And I promise you it'll be a thousand times more enjoyable than this nonsense.
I swear...
Little prudes will be sitting there with there panties soaked in a matter of fifteen minutes. Chicks will sit in a library, pretending to study for a midterm--but really, hiding behind an oversized textbook with one hand holding a kindle and rubbing their clit vigorously through their panties with the other. Guys will be walking around with prolonged hard ons and blue balls, taking every opportunity to shoot their load into an available sink in a public restroom while noone's looking... Really.
I'll fucking do it. Then, when I get enough money for writing my own erotic series, I'll find E. L. James in her no-doubt lavish micMansion and I'll force her into a bath of nair. I'll make a bonfire with her pubic hair. I'll stuff an oversize riding crop all the way into her twot so that it pokes right out of her head, taking her useless brain with it.
And now, Because I need to calm down, here's the gilbert godfreed link that Cody was talking about.
Enjoy!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K1RcKJVbHA
Wow, I'm speechless, I don't even know how to respond to that, it was brilliant and amazing and I love you for it.
The scary thing here is that I actually believe you.
Further note: this video is the only real reason this series exists.
And as much as I hate to admit it, Christian Gray is actually a pretty cool name...which is forever ruined for all eternity. (And yes, that bad writing there was intentional.)
Aww, why thank you, Cody. But you? Speechless? Impossible. lol
I've heard those books called Fifty Shades of Shit before, but never thought to see it elaborated on so well. Damn, Write Away. Awesome board post!
Thanks for the Gilbert Godfreed link. Hilarious!
I don't even know what to say to comment. Write Away, you are amazing. I'm still laughing as I'm typing this. Everytime I hear about fifty shades, I will think of you, and probably laugh my ass off. Lmao.
Thanks guys. I'm humbled.
I have this kind of--um, warped sense of humor which is rarely ever appreciated by anyone. I'm glad I've found a niche here. :)
Oh my God. The gilbert Godfreed link nearly killed me. Seriously, I was hysterical.
I've read 1.75 of the books. Some of the worst writing I have ever come across in my life. Christian is a childish immature jackass, and anastasia is a whiny little pansy bitch. I had no idea the books were based off of Twilight.
Right Away, your post was brilliant. Let me know when your book is written.
Hey, R.A. Thanks for the laugh... omg.... it's better than coffee at 6:00 Am!
Your welcome. :)
Hahaha, RA. After seeing that gloriously flaming piece of writing, I'll definitely pay you for a book. As for Fifty Shades of Gray, I read a free chapter and was left speechlessly horrified by the bad writing. I can't abide bad writing. I let other folk wander through Literotica and tell me about the better offerings, so I don't have to wade through the 90% crap, as Theodore Sturgeon would have it.
Oops, well if I have to pick nits on myself that should have been WA. :)
I'll give you a buck, Write Away. Nay, I'll give you two!
I guess I am one of the minority on ths board. I read the 50 shades books, and I liked them. The writing style could have been better, and shey could have been mature and called his length his coc, shlong, or whatever. I get that she made some twilight comparrisons, but she did have a plot. I liked the twilight books, I will say that. I loved the Harry Potter bgooks tooo. E. L. James, was someone who wasn't looking for fame, go look her up, she wasn't writing the books to make a quick buck. She worked for The BBC She worked behind the scenes. She even said she was a huge twilight fan. She meant the books to be just for her, then I guess someone thought it would be a good idea to ublish the books. I read the books, because a friend told me about them. I thought I wouldn't like them , but I was wrong. I didn't say I loved them, so I'm in the middle of the road. I think people should make up their own minds if the want to read the books or not. Oh a lot of people said those books saved their marages, so she must have done something right.
Yeah, because a bunch of prudes read the trilogy and decided, wow, I didn't know riding crops even existed. How absolutely naughty. I'm going to buy one so my hubby can spank my clit with it.
Sadly and disturbingly though, kids, is that it's a proven fact that a certain percentage of the sex displayed in Fifty shades of shit could actually qualify as rape. Also, to take the contraversy a bit further, let's take into account that most of the sexual sceens (if you can call them that) depicted in fifty shades of shit are actually not relevant to actual S&M activities. Those who are knowledgeable in S&M practices would be quick to point that out for you.
Now, to the christian prudish mommy types, this probably is all news and they still regard fifty shades of shit as wonderous. But that just goes to show that so many people are so sexually repressed that when a so-called erotic trilogy goes mainstream, they eat it up like hotcakes. Poor people. loll.
I'm on that superior trilogy as I've said before, people. Watch out for it. lol.
Mmm, hotcakes. Can you put a scene with hotcakes in your trilogy Bernadetta? I'd read that shit.
Oh, if you'd all like to see just how much rape is actually in the fifty shades trilogy, here's a link for you. Its a lot of reading, and some of it is definitely not safe for work, and some parts of the book will make you want to rip your own eyes out, I refer to the string scene here if you've read the book, but its a great site.
http://das-sporking.livejournal.com/242338.html
Thanks for the link, Cody. I don't think I have the patience to read through all of it. However, I did read quite a bit today. It provided me with some entertainment. Not to mention that they are dead on in the serious criticisms they have of it. I'd never seen it broken down quite that way, but they're right, and i'm glad they put it out there.
Damn, What I wouldn't give to see one of the prudes/sexual ignoramuses who revere fifty shades of shit read what cody posted above. I wonder how horrified they'd be to see how disturbing and idiotic this trilogy really is. How many people want to bet that all of the mommies who claim that fifty shades of shit fixed their marriage somehow would have their panties up in a bunch in an instant if they realized how much the sceenes resemble rape. Who wants to bet they'd huddle and cry in a corner and swear off fucking their husbands forever? Garder belts, anyone? hahahahaha
No, I don't think you'd be seeing garter belts. I think if someone revered the books that much, they'd try to find ways to deny what those two wrote on LJ. No doubt the denials would be as stupid as the books, but I still think that's how it'd go.
you know the funny thing is I hate twilight but I loved 50 shades, lol. I can agree that the first book didn't have that much but the second and third books got a hell of a lot better. I liked them at any rate, and really, barring the insecurities that man had I would love to have me a christian gray in my life lol.
Haven't read them and don't plan on it. Even aside from te craz sex it's not my thing. I'm more of an epic fantasy guy myself.
I actually read somewhere that she originally published it as a Twilight fanfiction and got shouted down for that, so she took it down and rewrote it into the trilogy it became.
I just got done reading the first book. It was beyond awful. I actually read each chapter, then went and read the comments on that Livejournal page. Incidentally, thanks for the link to that, it was hilarious, but also made some very legitimate and sobering points. I have to agree that it was one of the most horribly written books I've ever read. Ana is just plain stupid, and I swear if I'd had to read about Christian touching her sex one more time I would have vomited. Someone mentioned that him using the term length to describe his dick was ridiculous, but her constantly referring to her vagina as her sex was far worse, in my opinion. Needless to say, I don't think I'll read the other two books, even though I usually like to finish series once I've started them. I only started this one on the recommendation of my sister, who raved about it.
Speaking of the second book, thanks for the Segway there GT, they just started there sspork of the second book. Its just as awesome.
Any type of book where the author constantly uses the same words over and over again shows a lack of imagination, not just books about sex. I have no ointention of reading this series but have gotten a real kick out of all the comments here.
I've been keeping up with the spork, and it hasn't disappointed so far. makes me glad that I haven't bothered to continue reading the actual series.
I've heard you can always tell whether Ana likes something or not. If she does it's Oh my! If not it's Oh god! LOL. I recently listened to an interview with StephenKing where he talked about that.
Then of course there's her classic response to everything, blushing. I actually sat down with my sister and asked her what the hell she saw in those books. Her response was something to the effect that like terrible reality TV, once the utter stupidity sucks you in, you have to stick with it until the end. You can't pull yourself away from it.
All I had to do was listen to a sample of the narrator. Shudder...
Oh my...Oh god...As she blushes and touches his length.....
Puuuuuuuuuuuuuuukkkkkke!!!
Yeah really. LOL.
No no, she blushes as her inner goddess does a happy dance and bounses up and down in her seat like a four year old wanting ice cream. That isn't a direct quote, but its damned close, and its damned disgusting.
Lol, here's something that randomly occurred to me. I'm sure a google search would answer my question, but I'm not sure if I really want to commit to knowing that badly. So...Fifty Shades started out as fanfiction, so are there actually Fifty Shades fanfics? That would be disturbing in so many ways.
I would imagine so. I'm not really curious enough to find out.
Unfortunately, yes.
I figured as much. I mean I like a good sex scene in a book but the ones in Fifty Shades just seem way too over the top.
I'll never read the books, but the spork on it is fascinating. I enjoy the spork comments more than the quotes from the quotes from the book, to be honest.
Maybe I'll look into those sometime.